Sharpening Iron

Proverbs 27:17

Archive for the ‘Theology’ Category

Do we as humans ALWAYS have to demonize other people groups?

Posted by Chris Taylor on August 6, 2009

Are we genetically predetermined to demonize other people groups, who believe differently than we do?

Are we somehow hard wired to “hate” others?  To mock them?  To ridicule them?

WE are the human race – WE are in this together.  Blacks, Whites, Asians, Jewish, Protestant, Catholic, Intelligent and Ignorant.  WE are no better than our neighbor.  WE are no worse than our neighbor.

One man kills another.  One man rapes a woman.  A woman murders another and cuts out her fetus.   A man robs a store and kills 3 people – motive unknown.  A man shoots up a fitness club – motive loneliness.

If circumstances had been different, if things had gone a different way, perhaps we might have been that person.  Many small things add up to the whole of who we become.

People demonize people of religion.  Religious people demonize non-religious people.  IT SUCKS.

All the while, the “demon-izers” claim to be “better” than the “demons”.

That man who shot up the fitness club in PA made a diary entry and in this diary entry he talked about God.

The intellectual heavy weights (specifically *some of* the commentators) over at Pharyngula (who espouse scientific method as one of the highest principles of living) choose to make a case of this as “religion is bad”.  GIVE ME A BREAK.

Pharyngula: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/08/another_mass_murder.php

NOW, to be fair, many Christians are just as bad.  Two sides of the same freaking coin and they don’t even know it.

Well, I was going to post a link to a Christian blog abusing Atheists, but they seem to be harder to find. (I know they exist, but they don’t seem to be as prolific as the anti-Christian/anti-Religion blogs – if you would like to submit one, I’ll update this post with the appropriate entry). ** UPDATE: What I really need is a Christian blog post where the commenters (?) / commentators are bashing atheism/atheists as ignorant, evil, despicable people as PZ’s blog post itself doesn’t do that – that is found in the comments.

Here some purported Christian blogs that would be representative of the “bad side” of Christianity (the other side of the coin) (DISCLAIMER: I have my doubts these are truly Christian bloggers and may be pretenders much like “Angry Xtian” was but to be fair, I’ll include them)

Atheistwatch
Atheist-Fools

I SINCERELY HOPE that neither group is truly representative of their groups as a whole.  God helps us if they are.

Chris

(I’ve made some corrections to this post as it was pointed out to me that my post lumped all of the people at Pharyngula into the same “boat” so to speak)

Posted in Theology | Tagged: , , , | 11 Comments »

Song written/played by a friend of mine

Posted by Chris Taylor on July 24, 2009

Check out this song…Pretty good stuff.  Country/Southern sound…a little like a slow Bon Jovi song.

http://www.myspace.com/bbillingsmusic

Name of the song is 21 Guns and starts playing automatically.

Posted in Theology | Leave a Comment »

Reverence & Awe

Posted by Chris Taylor on June 18, 2009

“The awareness of grandeur and the sublime is all but gone from the modern mind.  Our systems of education stress the importance of enabling the student to exploit the power aspect of reality.  To some degree, they try to develop his ability to appreciate beauty.  But there is no education for the sublime.  We teach the children how measure, how to weigh.  We fail to teach them how to revere, how to sense wonder and awe. The sense for the sublime, the sign of the inward greatness of the human soul and something which is potentially given to all men, is now a rare gift.”

– Abraham J. Heschel “God in Search of Man: A philosophy of Judaism” page 36


Posted in Theology | Leave a Comment »

God is not a scientific problem

Posted by Chris Taylor on June 17, 2009

From Abraham Joshua Heschel “God in Search of Man: A Philosophy of Judaism” pages 101-102

Not a Scientific Problem

What are the grounds for our certainty of the realness of God?  It is clear that we cannot submit religion to scientific logic.  Science is not the only way to truth, and its methods do not represent all of human thinking.  Indeed, they are out of place in that dimension of human existence in which God is a burning issue.

God is not a scientific problem, and scientific methods are not capable of solving it.  The reason why scientific methods are often thought to be capable of solving it is the success of their application in positive sciences.  The fallacy involved in this analogy is that of treating God as if He were a phenomenon within the order of nature.  The truth, however, is that the problem of God is not only related to phenomena within nature but to nature itself; not only to concepts within thinking but to thinking itself.  It is a problem that refers to what surpasses nature, to what lies beyond all things and all concepts.

The moment we utter the name of God we leave the level of scientific thinking and enter the realm of the ineffable.  Such a step is one which we cannot take scientifically, since it transcends the boundaries of all that is given.  It is in spite of all warnings that man has never ceased to be stirred by ultimate questions.  Science cannot silence him [man], because scientific terms are meaningless to the spirit that raises these questions, meaningless to the concern for a truth greater than the world that science is engaged in exploring.

God is not the only problem which is inaccessible to science.  The problem of the origin of reality remains immune to it.  There are aspects of given reality which are congruous with the categories of scientific logic, while there are aspects of reality which are inaccessible to this logic.  Even some aspects and concepts of our own thinking are impregnable to analysis.

Very, very well put.

God Bless.

Chris

Posted in Theology | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »

That is INTENSE

Posted by Chris Taylor on May 22, 2009

While I may not agree with Greg Boyd on some of his thoughts, no one can deny that he is a deep thinker.

Greg Boyd is a proponent of “Open Theism” – that the future is partly open to God.  Many critics claim that this violates Romans 8:28

And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.

Because if the future was partly open, then how could we trust this promise?

Yet,  Greg points out that this is built on an assumption that we are making.  That we assume that God possesses “limited intelligence” and is unable to deal with infinite possibilities.  If His intelligence is indeed infinite, then possibilities are known and likelihood of those possibilities.

That’s very, very intense.

He has a blog post over at his site discussing God’s infinitude – His unlimited-ness if you will.

Check it out!

http://www.gregboyd.org/blog/the-significance-of-gods-infinitude/

Posted in Theology | 1 Comment »